Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'brians'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Tools of the Trade
    • Passau
    • True Hockey
    • Warrior
    • Reviews
    • Mods
    • Pads
    • Masks + Cages + Neck Guards
    • Chest Protectors - C&As
    • Gloves
    • Blockers
    • Skates + Holders + Steel
    • Sticks
    • Pants + Knee Pads
    • Accessories + Training Aids
    • Gear
  • Staff Articles
    • Website Info
    • Interviews
    • Deep Dives
    • Staff Reviews
    • Demo Gear + Initial Impressions
  • Swap Shop
    • The Goalie Crease
    • New Gear
    • Used Gear
    • Repairs / Mods
    • Lifestyle
    • Want to Buy / Want to Trade
  • Technique
    • Bandits Goalie School
    • ICE
    • Roller
    • Ball / Street
    • Health + Fitness + Training
  • Banter
    • Beta Log
    • Pro Zone
    • Chirp Zone
    • Lifestyle

Blogs

  • Industry Interviews
  • Gear

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


About Me


Location


Hometown


Leg Pads


Review:


Glove


Review:


Blocker


Review:


Chest & Arm Protector


Review:


Pants


Review:


Mask


Review:


Stick


Review:


Skates - Boot


Review:


Skate - Cowling


Review:


Skates - Blades


Review:


Knee Pads


Review:


Neck Guard


Review:


Jock


Review:


Leg Pads


Glove


Blocker


Chest & Arm Protector


Pants


Mask


Stick


Skates - Boot


Skate - Cowling


Skates - Blades


Knee Pads


Neck Guard


Jock

Found 16 results

  1. Easin

    G5 vs optik 2

    Opinions needed. Warrior g5 or optik 2 pads? And why? Anyone have trouble with the optik 2's s curve? My g4's are pretty flat.
  2. Preface and Introduction For a while now I’ve been wanting to write up a piece about my experiences, thoughts, critiques, opinions, etc. about the Brian’s G-NETik series. I’ve been wanting to do this to do this because I’m a huge gear enthusiast/nerd, a Brian’s gear nerd, and have a lot of experience in their gear as my first set of gloves were a Brian’s blocker (Thief) and Heaton (Helite 2 or 3) glove in 1995. I want to focus on what the gear is, where it came from with respect to where I come from, what I think Brian’s could do to improve upon the series/idea, what I think Brian’s could do to improve on their statistical process control in manufacturing (where it’s strong and where it’s weak), what my design philosophy is for a “good” equipment, and generally whatever else I end up throwing in the mix. Ideally, I would love to do more of these but gear is hard for me to come by in Oregon. I’d love to demo stuff and provide journalistic written reviews with pictures. I’ve always wanted to do truly dedicated gear reviews for companies or help with the design process. Everything in here is my opinion or information I gleaned from watching videos Joz made with various outlets or older Brian's catalogues: Summary, but not complete list, of respective gear items I have personally had experience with devoid of my thoughts on each: Owned: DX2 gloves, middle edition Vision pads, late edition Vaughn Legacy gloves, Vaughn Velocity 1 pads, G-N3Tik pads, Optik gloves, G-NETikIV pads and catcher. Demoed: DX2 pads, 2S pads and blocker, G4 gloves, VE8 pads and blocker, SLR2 pads, G-NETikIV blocker. Off-ice takedowns: G-NETik 1 pads, Velocity 2 pads, Velocity 3 pads, Velocity 1 gloves, Velocity 6 pads, first edition Epic gloves, 5500 glove, CCM Retroflex pads, and Optik 2 blocker. The Pads Section 1: Background & Perceptions on Design Philosophy 1.1 Going back in time to see how the series has shifted throughout the years I started with what media I could find on the series from the first incarnation, in 2012, to the current 2018 revision. From this video we can learn that the G-NETik started as a hybridization of the Zero G and SubZero line for a hybrid goalie. It started out a flexible pad, focusing on the boot break, featuring a double break and still functional internal knee rolls. Over time this has come to define the series as a pad that has torsional flex, light weight, and can play like a properly sealing butterfly pad. --What does this all mean? The goal was to make a pad that a hybrid goalie would want, that a butterfly goalie could use and would appreciate, and to iteratively innovate upon both the past and each individual piece over time. We could draw high-level model comparisons to the Vaughn Velocity, the CCM Eflex, the Warrior Ritual GT, to name a few. Do I think these are all entirely accurate? No, but they’re the closest from each manufacturer. --What do I think they are doing to achieve this philosophy and are they achieving it? Brian’s has been pushing their strapping methods and design hard since its inception because they clearly believed and do believe in it. I think they were and are absolutely right to do so. A summary of things I think they’re doing right and should continue to do: Keep gently iterating the strapping, though maybe slow down a tad since it could be reaching its finality could become a case of “change for the sake of change.” The identity of the series is spot on. The torsional flex is definitely a thing and key factor as well as the overall richness of the materials used on the leg channel. All bells and whistles are pragmatic. The weight and balance of the gear manufactured is very good. The level of options after purchase is very nice. The materials used and their locations used on the pads are spot on. Keep pushing the materials boundary. Please make it stock to have at least the instep of the boot also covered in Primo though, the nylon could/would wear away much faster and absorbs water. This is something I customized after demoing a set and getting a wet boot after only 20 minutes, it was stock on the G-N3Tik. The toe options are great, but please improve their quality or make it easier to order replacements. I wore through a set in 6 months and could not get a response on how to replace them. For change I have two points here though: I feel like they should offer the option to make any/all straps nylon (specifically the calf in is my desire) instead of only the boot (default) and the optional lower leg strap on the IV (mine is nylon, I love this thing). My feeling is that they already offer such amazing customization that this ability could really push them even further. Maybe they already would do this if asked, but I’m not sure. Push your envelope of making a modular leg pad even further. By this I mean: Please make the Rotational Control/Professor/Upper Calf strap standard and add a spot where it can be added/removed. This was done on the Optik 2, but make it standard instead of custom/when asked on the G-NETik. This strap encompasses what I feel this pad is trying to do: be for the goalie that wants to feel like the pad is an extension of their leg without hindering their hybrid or butterfly style game. Make it so that a calf pillow can be added/removed with it default removed. I actually talked to a rep (still have his card, but it feels weird to name people) about this at Tendyfest when I first demoed the 4s. 1.2 Being a Brian’s pad meant a few things immediately: it was going to be highly customizable, it would be (mostly) devoid of traditional strapping, and the leg channel would feature some sort of material. Each revision tries to improve on something from the previous. Some examples include: 1->2 Added primo on high wear areas and, refined the outside calf wrap, added a way to integrate the knee pad, flattened the outside knee rolls further, new elastic boot strap, nylon boot strap, and added the pro bump on the knee. 2->3 Refined the boot area, opened the knee cradle, refined the strapping for the knee further, thinned out the calf, thinned out the thigh further, all semblance of outer knee rolls are gone, and x-static leg channel. 3->4 Opened the leg channel (now Airknit material), stiffened the standard boot slightly, primo bindings and landing surface, SBA knee cradle, rid all landing zones of binding and thus squared off and heavily stiffened all landing areas, refined the strapping further, thinned the profile further, reshaped the outer roll from square to right-trapezoidal The Smart Strap system has only gotten more streamlined and integrated in the design with each revision, starting from a loose “Y” shape in the 1 and 2 series, an “X” strap in the 3 (where the knee rise strap was now tied to the calf strap, and to a “IV” strap for the IV/4 version. The calf strap is now fully integrated into the calf-wing instead of there being a separate closure. This slow incrementation has allowed for the calf region to slowly become more spacious as well, which I think only benefits the pad. The knee strap has moved around a bit, becoming less traditionally placed and thinner over time, always with the option to drop to the calf velcro. Figure 1 & 2. G-N3Tik strapped and G-NETikIV strapped Section 2: Comparative General Review of the G-N3Tik and G-NETikIV 2.1 I think about Statistical Process Control quite a lot as a big portion of my job revolves around it. I also think about gear a lot and base many judgments on what I am personally considering implementations or a lack of SPC in the manufacturing process. 2.2 Suffice to say, I have very little issues with the quality of the products. What I have mostly amount to are small gripes, for example of a thing I like, but then want to complain about. Case and point, starting with the toe of both models. On the 3 the lace binding the toes is horizontally oriented, exposing more of it to wear. As seen here, my right pad’s toe has some visible wear directly on the lace, as well as the expected wear on the Primo. The lace should not be here, but that’s difficult to avoid with its orientation. Figure 3 & 4. Boot wear on G-N3Tiks after 2 years of use (rate of 3-4 ice times/week) On the 4 the lace is oriented vertically, thus exposing less of it outwardly. A simple design change with a potentially large impact to durability, a simple decision to make once thought of with simple implementation. What I want to point out here is that the binding is also more recessed on the left pad and that the lace is in a more vulnerable spot on the right pad (I measured, they are in different locations and not always equispaced). It’s apparent that the right one has a lace that is worn (I have mitigated this by coating it in super glue). This lace should not be here and is avoidable with this set-up. This wear appeared in about the second month of use and never got worse after I coated it, but was easily avoidable if the laces were placed exactly the same on both pads and with the exact same finish. I will own up and say this did teach me that I am harder on the boot of my right pad, I suspect because of right post RVH use and other factors. Figure 5 & 6. Boot wear on G-NETikIV after 6 months of use (rate of 4-5 ice times/week) None of this is to say that this is egregious, but rather here is a space for further improvement in the manufacturing of top tier products. I would like to postulate that some tighter SPC on this could prevent this from happening, and thus prevent potential return requests or complaints while requiring (likely) minimal effort. I am absolutely not worried about this wear having a large effect down the line on these pads nor do I think it’s difficult to fix if necessary. The inside of the ankle is a similar story, supporting that boy am I harder on my right boot than my left. On both my G-N3Tik and G-NETikIV pads I wore through the stitching in the middle of the right ankle. I caught it right away on the 4’s and also coated it with super glue, and again, with no further wear visible since. I do not fault this as a manufacturing process, but instead would suggest maybe a wear-plate like what Bauer is doing on their pads. I suspect this has either been tried, or has been ruled out in design for whatever reason. In looking at other manufacturers I have noticed that no others include a boot that is stitched or cut like Brian’s. The way Brian’s does it is the most transparent statement I see of, “this boot is made to be flexible on demand” compared to other brands. Something I really like that was done between the 3’s and 4’s is that this stitching has been intelligently recessed on the 4s around the stiffer inside foams, decreasing its likelihood of dragging on the ice. Some might argue that the binding should be removed entirely, but it’s not a problem when it is this recessed. Perhaps revise that further and see what can be improved or if the stitching can somehow be hidden. Figure 7-10. Close up image of the ankle breaks of each pad. Continuing on the foot/ankle area, let’s look at the part of the calf flap that comes down to the foot. A very nice change that was made from the 3 to the 4 is covering the end of this with Primo. It stymies the water absorption and prevents wear in one of the highest wear areas on pads. Figure 11-14. Bottom edge of calf wrap change With respect to Figure 21, I feel this should be entirely standard. For whatever reason after the G-N3Tik Brian’s went away from covering the whole underside of the boot with Primo and thus I asked for it to be done on my G-NETikIVs. I say this because without this cover the nylon soaks water and can become a major wearpoint in my experience. A nice touch they implemented when I had this done was that they covered the laces on the instep portion of it, making it much smoother and out of harm’s way. Figures 15, 16, 18, 20 are to show the wear I’ve kicked up on the strap tab over my course of playing. Nothing bad here, you’ll notice that the taper measure on my boot wore off on the 3’s, which is 80 degrees. This marking was omitted on my 4’s since I asked for minimal logos (only the Bstar and model name). I have found it interesting that my black straps and nylons have had more visible thread splitting, but nothing of a quality concern and more of an observation. I really like having the nylon boot strap. I wear them through my Lundy loops and find them very easy to dial in to the tension that I want. Figure 15-21. The boot, its straps, and other friends To close this section out I want to talk about the toe-ties. You have probably noticed that I am not using the stock ties on either pads; on my 3s I have ECOproFOAM elastic ties that have served me very well and on my 4s I have prolaces. For the first year I used skate lace with knots for slack in them on my 3s, which I have since been cannibalizing for uses like tying my dangler on my mask and using as a carrier strap for my 4s. On my 4s I used the stock elastic ties, which function great, until I wore through them entirely. This quality needs to be addressed, the function of the stock ties on the 4s is great, but their durability was rather poor (I have no pictures, I could not find them after a quick look). I have used the ECOproFOAM ties longer on my 3s than I did on my 4s with barely any wear however that was achieved. Perhaps I needed to wax them to keep them going or something. I do prefer the way the stock ones velcro together over the other two completely. I have used all my toe-ties in the offset manner for easier pad rotation and less stress on my knees. 2.3 The leg channel material compositions are notably different between the 3 and 4. The 3 has a Primo hex-air imprinted cradle, which I frankly quite liked except for it squeaking against the knee pads, the 4 have use the SBA no-slip-grip nashlike material, which is quite plush. I don’t think I favor either here completely, but I’ll lean toward the nash with regards to making sure my leg doesn’t slip off the knee. The leg channel in the 3 is X-static, which I really liked theoretically and in practice as the things didn’t smell at all after two years. I’m not sure I’m as big of a fan of the Airknit and SBA leg channel on the 4s, but I also don’t have negative opinions about it since it dries out really fast due to the surface area provided by the Airknit. I had thought a big change for me when going from the 3 to the 4 was going to be the feel of the leg channels given how much more open the inside area is on the 4s, but it felt totally fine even when I first demoed the 4s prior to ordering/owning a set. I drastically prefer the outer calf wrap on the 4. I think I’d like to have a sort of Air-Pac pillow in the calf area if it were removable, but I get why there isn’t. Everything about the inner leg of the 4 is stiffer, and not because it is newer. The knee block is stiffer and all wings and wraps are stiffer. The only thing I did not like this on was the outer knee wing, but it didn’t matter too much. I have since removed the outer knee wing on the 4s and added a Kennesky professor strap that I had done with a magnetic buckle. I have not gotten to try this out but know I will like it just from having tried it on; I had planned to build my own professor strap but after pricing it out and looking at getting friends/family to help me construct it knew I was a little in over my head when it came to achieving the quality I knew I wanted. I usually use the pads with the knee pads mounted to the little tab provided on the pads. I removed it for the sake of picture taking and to re-try it without them attached now that I have the professor strap as an anchor point, but I suspect I’ll be going back since having them attached hinders no movement or form of rotation due to the generous length of the elastic and it helps keep the knee pads in place. Figure 22-24. The leg channels This is what sold me on the pads immediately; the landing on the 4s is greatly improved and really brought the G-NETik into the modern era. It’s stiff, it’s rigid, it’s hard, it slaps the ice when you drop. The overall shape of the features are the same: the kneeblock is square, there is a rectangular calf wing, and both knee blocks have the pro bump. If it’s not immediately obvious from Figures 25-27, the 4s are entirely squared up on the landing edge and the 3s are not. Additionally, the 4s have Primo here standard, and it slides just as great as everyone else has said. I was overshooting slides for the first couple of weeks when I got these, and that is not a complaint. It made my games so much easier to keep my energy during, there is much less energy lost to friction on these pads. There is nowhere that any binding could touch the ice on the 4s, everywhere above the knee above both pads is bindingless, but the 4s has hidden the binding on the inside edge behind the calf landing, knee landing, and recessing it. Figure 25-27. The landing edge 2.4 The face of the pads on the 4s is taut, with no visage bindings, and stiffer. Thus the rebounds kick out much harder. Many of my teammates immediately noticed that I was kicking them out further. Of course there are pads that kick out harder, like the Optiks, but these are not soft rebound-killer pads. My 3s were a little loose on the face, I suppose by design and due to the softer flex profile I had on them of a 5-3-2 (ankle-knee-thigh). My 4s have a flex profile of 4-3-1 on them and the pad has a much more defined precurve that I am a huge fan of. They are by far the stiffest pad I’ve ever owned, which does not say much since they are not an incredibly stiff pad. The torsional flex is welcome when playing on the posts and moving since I tend to get my pads bigger and it makes them feel like they are moving with my leg. For the most part, I hardly notice the torsional flexibility. The 4s are laterally much stiffer than the 3s and I think that is entirely for the better. In Figures 28-31 below the seal of the pads can be observed. I would like to note that the 4s have a little give on the landing so that the seal is slightly better than pictured, but I do still notice a little rise because the knee sticks out a little more than the thigh. Thus, the 3s seal better upfront, but my 4s actually hold the fort slightly better due to their stiffness. I’ve experienced some pretty hard shots kick off the thighs on the 4s that would have made, and did make, the 3s bend in. Edit: Adding that I've never had a goal go in due to a seal problem on my 4s. I have a couple stuff under my 3s calves when RVH leaning on the post, which is partially technique and partially the pad being soft enough to allow it to move off the ice. I do think on the next pad in the line there should be a focus on really making this thigh seal a stronger point of the pad since it does everything else so well. I like the more trapezoidal outer roll and I like that it’s still there. If I were to ever get something like the Optik I would want the outside roll of the G-NETik. I do not RVH with my pad inside the net and have made a few saves because of my roll, so I do want to keep them while I can, especially if it adds rigidity. Figure 28-31. Mock Butterfly and Pad Seal 2.5 The QC on both pads is fantastic, not a stitch out of place and both of my (relatively simple) graphics requests were beautifully executed. The attention to detail as an evolution of the line from one to the other is great to see, for example the hiding and recessing of the bindings on the inside edge, the revision of the strapping to be more simplified and comfortable, and the use of high quality materials. There are a few things that, in my opinion, could be improved on without risking the identity of G-NETik. Namely thigh seal, make the leg channel more customizable after manufacturing (add a location to mount a professor strap and calf pillow), and improve the durability of the toe bungees. All of these are very small and not make-or-break. I am greatly looking forward to whatever comes next in this line. I plan to do a review of my Brian's gloves and blockers as well.
  3. With spring nearing, Brian’s will be releasing their retail version of the gnetik 4s!!! Hopefully some of you are as excited as I am.
  4. I'm looking to make the leap into custom gear. I'm currently in SLR 1s (32+2) with VE8 mitts (used to have VE8 pads as well, but really disliked them). Looking for input on moving into a new company; I've been looking at Bauer or Brians - particularly because custom options allow for a smaller palm on the mitts. I've read that while Vapor is more of a hybrid pad - it still kicks out some big rebounds (also - I wear a 2x pro c/a, and figure the same ecosystem ensures a better fit). I've tried the strapping on the Vapors and find it very comfortable. I've also heard a lot of good things about the O2 mitts and the max core. Seeking additional input before I throw down $3k on pads. Thanks in advance for all your help.
  5. Version 1.0.0

    28 downloads

    44 page PDF saved from Goalies-Only.com.
  6. Brian’s Optik ((FLX)) size 33+1.5. Used for one year and 3 months in mid-level men’s league, approx. 2x ice times per week. Comes with prolaces attached and an elastic boot strap, but I have the original toe strapping to include. Minor wear to toe and inside top corners (see pictures). $550 USD, buyer pays shipping. Ships from Houston, TX.
  7. Was about to post this in response to @Aquilzz in the show off your gear thread, but figured it would fit better on its own. Based on the Optik glove I demo'd vs. the Bauer gloves I've had, the Optik felt like the palm was less substantial in terms of padding. I felt the puck way more on my palm than I've ever been used to. Wondering if a "pro palm" at Brian's with extra break in time would approximate what I feel with a well broken in Bauer? Is Brian's pro palm the same as other practice palms, or something in between stock and practice? I wouldn't ever consider getting a Practice palm in the Bauer, that would be waaaay too much overkill, but I felt like I just really felt the puck a little too much in the stock Optik I tried out. @TheGoalNet has mentioned in other threads that practice palms are overkill for anyone not actually practicing against high caliber shooters, and I agree with that, just wondering if Brian's pro palm is something in the middle? Note: I'm asking this mainly because although I love my 2S set, there's something about the Brian's gloves with BOA where I'm considering getting a custom glove at some point.
  8. Hey Old Guys & Adult League Players! 1.5 Hours of On-Ice Training for Beer League Adult Players $100.00! Bandits is hosting a Mini Clinic just for you! The details: What: 1.5 hours of ice on-ice instruction When: January 12, 2019, 4:45 p.m. - 6:15 p.m. Where: Farmington Hills Ice Arena, 35500 8 Mile Road, Farmington Hills, Michigan, 48335 Limited spots are available. Due to the high demand, we are limiting sign up to 16 goalies! Contact: Stan Matwijiw, Director of Operations, Bandits Goalie School, stan@banditsgoaltending.com Contact: Clayton Brown, Head Instructor, Bandits Goalie School, clayton.banditsgoaltending@gmail.com For all Adult League Goalies How often do you get to work on your game outside of well, games? Now is your chance! 1.5 hours of on-ice instruction where you will be able to actually practice your game with Professional Coaches. With our instruction you will be able to take your team deep into playoffs this season (sorry, boys! Golf league is starting late this year!). How about this for a New Year's Resolution?! All skill levels are welcome. This is a $250.00 value for only $100.00. For all you goalie that never got instruction - now is your chance! We will work hard, but let's be honest, we gotta be at work on Monday. Please contact owner and Director of Operations, Stan Matwijiw or Head Instructor Clayton Brown to sign up now!
  9. Thought I would give the old B⭐ a DB If this seems redundant, I will delete. I think this can be one central location for Brian's Info collected. Initially, I would like to discuss the differences between the BStar chest protector (Mid-range chesty $-point) and the OPT1K chest protector Please feel free to link any and all other info you may have on specs, sizes available, detachable arms, SR or PRO level, REVIEW, etc... First up is the Brian's B⭐ C & A Price: $358.99 USD https://www.goaliemonkey.com/catalog/product/view/id/331122?gclid=Cj0KCQiApvbhBRDXARIsALnNoK0HLjGHwCaYTljwDJK8Ewvot5bRI1eE4Xliu-u9rAL-dVol-qlEqV0aAmq8EALw_wcB
  10. Attached is my YouTube video review link regarding my thoughts on the Brian's Senior Pro Knee Guards that came with my set of Brian's Optik Pads. Please note, I only used them twice on the ice and gave up. People may think that's not a fair review but I have to say that sometimes in life you only get once chance and first impressions on gear are key. They are not as good as my Senior Warrior Ritual X Knee Guards. The Brian's knee guards moved around a lot under my socks for the first skate. The second game I put them over my socks and used the Velcro attachment strap to the pads and they worked very well and stayed in place with no tape. Personally, I'm just not a fan of having my knee guards attached to my pads and having them over my socks. Finally, the protection and comfort for landing are just not as good as other knee guards in the market. I'm paranoid about my knees whether taking shots to them or just protecting them from the pounding they take in butterfly so I want to ensure I have knee guards that are really comfortable. At this stage I plan on upgrading to either the Warrior Pro Ritual X or the Bauer Vapor 1X.
  11. I have a love/hate relationship with my Sub3 chesty. The body fits perfectly, but I like little else. The arms SUCK. The shoulder floaters get in my way. I tried sticking my Warrior Ritual Pro arms on. Big fail. I could not get them to fit the way they needed to. Factory Mad is going to beef the stock arms up, as the ONLY criticism was that I was feeling shots from 70 year old men. I can’t imagine what an ex-college or pro could do to me with those arms. The shoulder floaters were something I also could not abide. They would lift into my masque. What does a itching to mod rabbit do? Install smaller floaters! The mirror test shows that the Warrior floaters are lower profile without sacrificing protection. Mod note - Sorry everyone, picture was deleted.
  12. *if it's not in the good section please move it wasn't sure* Hey everyone i'm thinking about doing my own smart strap and i'm liking the one brian's are doing I'd just like to get opinion on what are the major difference on the 2 model (the one only calf and the one with the knee elastic too) is there a big feeling difference if in the one with the knee elastic too vs classic knee elastic? thanks in advance for your opinion BTW if you have no idea what i,m talking about i'm talking about this : https://www.goaliemonkey.com/accessories/leg-pad-accessories/brians-goalie-accessories-2in-replacement-smart-x-calf-strap-sr.html and these : https://www.goaliemonkey.com/accessories/leg-pad-accessories/brians-goalie-accessories-inner-calf-strap.html
  13. So I just recieved my Brian's opt1k gloves this week and was about to heat it when I remembered it had BOA in it. I became a little worried that the heat might damage the dials or mechanism. Does anyone know if I am able to still heat it to break it in. The proccess is spraying the outside with water, keeping it closed with a string or any other such item, then heating it in a skate oven for 5 min, then playing with the glove until it cools.
  14. Below is a link to my YouTube video comparison review of the Brian's Opt1k FLX Goalie Pads vs. Warrior Ritual G2 Pro Goalie Pads. "New vs. Old set." I apologize for the quality of this video as it was rushed because I was selling my Warrior pads the next day and I wanted to ensure I did this comparison. Key Highlights: Brians Opt1k Pro FLX (35.5" +1) Sliding - the sliding on the Optislide material is amazing. In all conditions they are top notch. By the 3rd period of a game when it gets pretty snowy this material continues to perform much better than the Warriors which do significantly slow down. This material is also thicker and seems much more durable. Strapping - the strapping on the Opt1k's are great with lots of options for all preferences. I do like the smart toe strap and the boot strap better than what Warrior uses. Although the Warrior boot and toe straps are much quicker to put on. Customization - I love the look of the Brian's Opt1k pads so I stuck with their core design and just customized my color options. Brian's does offer some amazing logo and other customizations if you really want to harness your inner artist expressionism. Seal to Ice - these pads offer a really stable firm knee block when slamming your knees into the ice and the full pad seals firmly to the ice. I find I don't let in as many goals that squeeze under my pads. I also find that the 5-hole coverage is better and I'm not giving up as my goals in this area as my Warriors. Pad Stiffness and Rebounds - I was pleasantly surprised that the E-foam in these FLX pads does have lots of punch with their rebounds. I understand the FLY core is even stiffer but the FLX have been great with some solid powerful rebounds much bigger than my Warriors. The flex in these pads are great to provide customization on how much curve you want with your pads. Warrior Ritual G2 Pro (36" +1.5) Weight - the weight is still lighter than the Opt1k and this is an area Warrior prides itself. For me, weight is important and I prefer to have pads that are on the lighter end of the scale. Profile Lock Patent System - I found this system really great to help customize the curve of my thigh rise. Especially helpful for me with a narrow butterfly. Knee Driving System - I really liked how the knee rotated in these pads. There was extra angled padding used in the knee cradle and knee block to help really push the knee into the knee block.
  15. Here is my review of the Brian's Optik Pro Glove vs. Bauer S170 Glove. This video is about Brian's Optik Pro Goalie Glove vs. Bauer S170 Glove. I’ve used the Bauer S170 for 9 months and purchased this upgraded Optik glove this summer. In the couple skates I’ve had with the Optik glove it is a fantastic goalie glove. The double T with lace in the pocket just eats up pucks and they don’t pop out. The amount of rebounds I’ve been able to minimize is a game changer. I’ve had teammates already comment that my glove hand is better. Brian’s has also done an amazing job breaking in this glove. It closes really great for a game ready palm. The boa system for tightening the glove works so well and the clam shell opening to air out the glove is easy to open and gain access to the boa set up quickly. Bauer S170: This glove is a good deal for the price coming in at a fraction of the cost compared to the Optik. So if you are on a budget then this glove should work fine. If you are really particular and performance is paramount then this glove is not for you. Gaps for this glove, break-in time, ability for puck to stick in the basket, palm protection for high level shots, finally the Velcro and strapping is not nearly at the level of a pro Optik. In summary, hard to compare these goalie gloves as they are in different classes but I hope this helpfully highlights the differences between an entry level vs. pro glove. If you have $$$$ and are focused on performance go with a pro glove like the Brian’s Optik. If you are on a tight budget, like to upgrade regularly then go with this Bauer.
  16. This is my comparison video review of Brian's Optik Blocker vs. Bauer S170 blocker. Probably not the most fair comparison as I'm comparing a pro blocker vs. a senior entry level one but it should help illustrate some of the key differences when making your next blocker purchase. I'm now a true believe that all blockers are not equal and that "a block is just a blocker" quote is not really accurate. High Level: The Brian's Optik blocker is definitely one of best in it's class of high end blockers. Brian's offers some great customization for colors and custom logo options to the face of the blocker. One of the key reason's I upgraded to this blocker was for the exceptional finger protection. The Bauer S170 really lacked effective index finger protection and I paid the price for this a couple times with the puck coming up and hitting that finger dead on underneath the finger flap. The Boa System that it uses for adjusting the wrist is nice but not a big deal as I keep it at one standard setting. The other areas where Brian's has excelled is the materials used in the glove to cut down on bacteria and durability of the palm of the glove which are much better than the Bauer Blocker. The final point I'll make is that the Brian's Optik Blocker offers some great flexibility in the wrist which has really helped me with more effective puck redirects to the corner. Overall, I've learned to recognized that finger protection on a blocker is very important so the extra dollar investment for me is worth it. Both blockers weigh the exact same and are extremely light. If you are someone where budget is key then going with the Bauer you'll still have to examine some options to mod the finger protection.
×
×
  • Create New...