-
Posts
168 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
6
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Gallery
Blogs
Events
Downloads
Posts posted by RedX
-
-
22 minutes ago, seagoal said:
For real. Do we even know what the hell 580, 590, and 600 mean, yet? Why name a break angle on a glove a number but not use the actual number of the thing being measured. I'm sure there is some explanation that I missed or chose to ignore over the years, but the fact still stands that 580 means 90 degrees, so why not just call it Reebok/CCM/Lefevre/True 90? Why add another level of obscurity and confusion? Why use a symbol to refer to an existing symbol?
Are arcs in a circle measured in something different than degrees in ole' Canada?
Yeah….we do know that they mean.
- 2
-
On 10/2/2023 at 7:15 AM, ser33 said:
Can anyone share their experience of riding 1 piece and 2 piece? How much difference is there in the height of the skate and the inclination of the holder? Will the transition from 2 pieces to 1 piece be smooth or will it take some getting used to?
I will be grateful for any feedback
For me I like being closer to the ice. You may feel a little flatter footed because they aren’t pitched forward so it will be up to you find your balance point.
For me the best part of being lower to the ice is less stress on my hips and knee when I recover to my feet. I’ve played around with taller steel and taller holders, which may make catching your edge and pushing slightly easier when you’re already in your butterfly. Hopefully you are able to imagine this in your head, but when I was recovering, in my taller blades/holders my blade is taller and my holder is taller, therefore my knee is now higher when I plant my foot. The higher my knee was the more stress I had on my legs in the recovery positions. Since switching into the one piece 4-5 years ago I’ve noticed my hips and knees feel much better.
- 1
-
-
-
-
I may be weird but to me I believe the 591 feels closer to a 580. The 581 feeling closer to the 590.
Anyways take a look at these
https://www.psscalgary.com/ccm-eflex-6-allout-glove-set-sr.html
-
-
2 hours ago, Chenner29 said:
Take that back, I love my stupid L shape gloves
Agreed, the steeper thumb angle is much better on the Lefebvre. Plus I think they present much better.
-
13 hours ago, tgfoo said:
Here you go:
Then compared to the stock Mach (on the left, 2-piece on the right)
2-piece feels tight, but then the Mach felt tight when I first got it, so I’m guessing it’ll be more comfortable after a few games. Though, after my initial impressions, I think I like the Mach more, but we’ll see if that changes after a few games.
It’s also too bad they don’t give the Mach and Hyperlite palm.
My pro-return one has the new style one.
-
-
I have been able to handle some of the modded grey RbK ones before the official Koho branded ones. But the genuine Suisse style can be bought from WS Composite. The one thing I have stole from this design is adding Eva style foam on the landing gear of my knee pads.
- 3
-
We talk about evolution in gear and taking leaps forward. I do wonder about the knee pad, most companies have made some version that is essential this design for the last 20 years. Even the big Suisse style Giguere knee pads were modded versions of this design.
I wouldn’t compare this to something like the 590 chest and arm which evolved into the the mythical P1. A design where people enjoyed the design and requested something similar for years. The knee pad seems to be of a “good enough I guess” mentality.
-
-
-
-
-
-
1 hour ago, Chenner29 said:
McElhinney wore Passau
He also made two vids about this absolute unit of a franken-knee
I’ve seen that video too. The flatness of the landing is such an interesting concept that makes sense for stability.
His logic was a basis of my theory on the rise of seemingly “retail” knee pads. A lot of the under 30 goalies never had that experience of thigh boards or when the NHL removed the attached Giggy knees (which is still a sore spot to me).
A lot of current crop of goalies would have used stock knee pads their whole career and just stuck with them.
-
29 minutes ago, Chenner29 said:
Fleury certainly was (is?) using this Reactor style which i screen grabbed a from a catalog from 1997. I’m not sure if he ever had them rebuilt, but I have seen plastic added to the thighs of them.
-
-
-
-
-
2023-24 Gear Sitings
in Gear
Posted · Edited by RedX
Fair enough I guess, all names are arbitrary, but I don’t think with 580/590 are unfounded when talking about gloves.
The 580 break is named after the KOHO 580 Glove that was popular. (KOHO 560 was actually the original).
590 break is named after the KOHO 590 glove where the break first appeared for KOHO.
So when ordering a new set of KOHO 590s in 2004 and you wanted the 590 graphic but you would ask for the 580 glove. This continued into the RBK era and beyond, the name stuck.
600 is named from hypothetical world where the KOHO line continued and this “could” have next iteration. I don’t think so, I don’t think the glove would exist without Carey Price, but that’s a debate for another day.
I don’t think this is any different then someone wanting Vaughn V10 but it’s actually a T5500.
Or ordering a Bauer Hyperlite 2 blocker but it’s actually a 1X.
So I guess yes?? We in hockey tend to stick to those (arbitrary) model names as opposed to actual descriptive features. I’m not sure why, it doesn’t seem likely to change anytime soon.