coopaloop1234

Does having my arms down by my side in defeat count as a stance?

Jesus man, do you not lingo? https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=murdered out

Almost every RVH on my left side?

luv u to bb. But I'm not hurt. Uhh, because they ain't my equal. #CoopforAdmin #Mutiny #Takeover

You're not special. See, I'm special.

I don't think you even want to tempt me to spam cat gifs. Also, don't you have an old man injury to nurse?

Pretty hard to get tossed out when you iz da king.

Congrats suckers. Want to take any bets who is going to be the first one to ban me? I'm going to guess @BadAngle41 @SaveByRichter35 has too much of a man crush on me to do it.

Don't make me fight you AND @TheGoalNet

I will, you socialist leech.

Remember when +2 and +3 thighrises were all over the place in the juniors and AHL? /shudder.

Don't tell me what to do. Just for that, I'm going to keep them in business.

Those aren't even close to the same though... The animal mouth = cage opening isn't copyrighted and the animals don't resemble each other at all.

And so you can ditch the title of "Full Right Scum"?

@TheGoalNet called it.

It's because you Full Right bastards are a stain on the goalie community. You know I kid.

@SaveByRichter35 need a new glove?

After doing some research into my quote above after reading Don and Bunny's comments, I've realized that I'm definitely wrong on the above. Shows how nuanced copyright law can be.

What's the difference between me doing it for free and someone else doing it for free? See, while you're completely right about how copyright law operates and your rights as the proprietary owner of the work, would you honestly exercise your legal right and chase me down if I were to copy your artwork on my own helmet by doing it myself? I'm also curious as to how many users on here rabidly defending copyright law would go up to a cover band and shame them for covering songs? I have a feeling not many and I think that's solely due to subject matter. We obviously take goalie gear more seriously than most goalies, let alone any one else, so we can be a bit protective/touchy about making sure our clan is happy. Ya know?

Just to stir the pot here, is a large portion of your uneasiness related to someone else getting paid for an artists original work? If i were to get a local artist to copy a well known design (exact replica), for free, would that make it OK in your books?

At that point wouldn't copyright law not take effect? See, I remember the post in question that sparked this whole discussion from TGN. I also remember posting about it too. I also remain in the same camp as I was before. I feel like the Potvin design, the Shark design, the Brodeur design should be more than fair game for any Joe blow playing at their rink and shouldn't feel like they're betraying the original artists or players by using their designs. I feel there is a line where an artist/manufacturer should make a stand and protect their product and that line is crossed once the average consumer becomes vilified for wanting to replicate their favourite design and/or athlete. (Especially if the designer and athlete are retired) I get why one would cross that line as copyright law and law in general can be a slippery slope and setting precedent is extremely important. Doesn't meant that I have to agree with it and the users that utilize it. I also want to cherry pick one quote here too: Pick any industry and it would be very easy to see a pattern of copying designs for not only a quick buck but as well for pushing technology forward. The me-too's and copycats are everywhere, video games, cars, bikes, food, beer, etc etc. It's not unheard of and is generally kind of part of any market.

Get a cowling. I'm assuming you're dragging your toes while in your backside recoveries and general sliding?

No need to make them a single mother of two...

You would wear that sweater.

Time is relative anyways.