12 hours ago, A.YOUNGoalie13 said:

 

Thatcarguy perhaps things not as they seem here… appears to me thegoalnet is pointing at something lol

This was confirmed to be an EFlex without the knee rolls and not a Premier without the inner roll. Axis 1 and 12.1 were both something similar to a stiff EFlex without knee rolls...

No matter what I am told, I assume this to be the prototype for either of those pads. I am not sure if the break up was 100% defined at the start of that season. I do know that what ended up being Axis was something Lefevre and CCM initially discussed together.

10 minutes ago, Madmedic6 said:

Ccm could step up their custom game by adding more options to customize the gloves they already manufacture. If I can choose what knee wrap I want on my pads, why can I choose what kinda wrist strapping my glove has? Or if I want the glove to have finger stalls or loops? If I want the bulge padding or flat padding on the wrist? I feel that the cross x strap was a great improvement. And I feel that if I could get a regular 580 with a cross x strap it would be even better and be more competitive than trues offerings. 

I agree. I ordered a Vapor 90 from Bauer this year. I was salty I could not get the Mach internals on the Vapor 90 glove. I am gonna just ignore the wrist strap when it comes in.

Have used the glove. My initial unboxing thoughts are pretty dead on.

The loops upgrade the glove from strange and borderline awkward to unique and different. My hand never felt like it was floating in a mitten, which it did with 591.

The closure feels much different than a legacy glove and almost mechanical? But it works very very well. The glove has great puck retention. There were a couple that didn't catch cleanly and they stayed in the glove perfectly.

This is definitively progress from the 591, but I am still not sure if the 80% majority of goalies would pick this over a traditional 580. 580 is still available via a custom order. 

15 minutes ago, Cias said:

Just ordered a set through TGC, was quoted at 24-27 weeks. Kind of expected for ordering late July though

Welcome to the board, thanks for joining 

18 hours ago, ThatCarGuy said:

I would absolutely love to make a custom All Out set of Axis using a flat faced EF4 graphic. I really liked how Bernier's looked

IYKUK

3 hours ago, ThatCarGuy said:

What face foam did you get on the pads? The knee rolls look more flush than the retail models

Went with the max rebound, this pad is probably spec'd closer to an Axis 2 than a EFlex 6 stock.

32 minutes ago, ZeroGravitas said:

1. What was the custom design process like? Similar to the Bauer process? Would you say your process is similar to what a retail customer goes trough?
2. Any hopes of CCM offering a library of older CCM/Heaton/Koho designs? Tell them to call it the "Heritage Collection" and make online customizers! I think this would get a lot more people looking at CCM gear. They can start with really popular retro designs - Potvin, 580, Heaton 10, etc. Maybe roll out additional designs throughout the years...

1. Always leery to say what a retail experience is vs mine, because I go direct to the brand. But it was pretty apples to apples with Bauer. I used a friend to do a mock up, CCM edited the mock up, I made a couple tweaks, and then it was approved. I am friends with the person that is who does the custom CCM graphics right now. I also contacted him directly with a few questions. Standard retail customers won't be able to do that either.

2. I have suggested that for like 7 years now.  The response I have always gotten is "we want to focus on the future, not the past". With social media, most good sets will be seen. We've already seen an H10, Revoke, Helite 3 (GGN), OG Potvin (Me), 2nd Gen Potvin (Pro Skate Goal), etc. I think a customer could just say "I want an H10 now and it would be easy to do". Unless something is in the works I don't know know about, I would assume no formal program comes. 

On 7/22/2023 at 7:51 AM, Madmedic6 said:

From my first skate in the ccm I can say it's is a much much different feeling glove than the true. The true is smooth and the break feels natural. The sure grip on the inside is nice and tacky when playing. The 581 just feels like I had a bump on my inner wrist. Inside didn't really have a grip besides the gigantic pinky loop. When closing it it felt like I was holding a hotdog bun in my palm, yes I'm fat and make food references. . Also I feel like the 581 closed more like a warrior g6.1 than a true/ccm 580. 

yours is stock? Does it have 2 fingers loops or 1? I have an index and a pinky on my total custom pro

Locking thread. @Hopeful-Padstacker welcome and please throw your question on the existing thread

22 hours ago, Novasteel31 said:

Buy some Bauer's

This... When it comes to rebounds, no one is in Bauer' league. Sliding, etc are all much closer brand to brand

On 7/13/2023 at 9:33 AM, Teezle said:

I was skeptical on the 591 in store, but since my set was won in a giveaway, I decided to go with it just to try something new. However they make the "total custom pro" CCM gear is definitely different from what gets made for stock in-store stuff, because I really enjoy my 591 glove. It doesn't have the traditional 580 overlap in the T (but the closure is not edges lining up with each other like a regular 590); I don't miss the finger stalls and I can close it with the fingers-to-palm () closure you expect from a 580 glove.

Total Custom Pro is made on the pro department assembly line in the same factory. I don't have specifics on the differences. It's where the NHL, CHL, etc gear is done

1 hour ago, coopaloop1234 said:

I like the mosey that CCM is trying with their gloves. It's too bad they're falling short. 

I've only tested the 591/581 in store, and they are some of the worst gloves I've had the pleasure of sticking my hands into. The lack of fingerstalls is too far of a departure for my dinosaur brain. 

 

Agree. It may not translate to sales, but A+ effort for trying to improve it 

Since TGN started, I’d say the glove has improved the least. It’s due for a major revolution 

I recently unboxed the new CCM EFlex 6 581 hockey goalie glove, and overall, it left me with mixed feelings. While it certainly has its positive aspects, there were a few drawbacks that may leave some goalies wanting to order a classic 580 instead.

Let's start with the positives. One of the standout features of the EFlex 6 581 glove is the addition of new finger and pinky loops. These loops provide excellent traction, making it easier to close the glove. This should translate to easy puck control to secure those hard shots. It's a small detail, but it can make a significant difference in performance.

Another notable benefit is the game ready palm. Compared to its predecessor, the 591, the palm on the EFlex 6 581 closes much better. This improvement allows for easier transition from purchase to on ice usage and overall comfort.

The wrist strap design on this glove is also worth mentioning. It's the same as the 591. Based on my 591 experience, it offers a secure and comfortable fit, ensuring that the glove stays in place during intense gameplay. This attention to detail in the strap design enhances the overall user experience and adds to the glove's usability.

Furthermore, the palm padding of the EFlex 6 581 glove is robust and provides excellent protection. Base on my experience with the 591 of similar construction, goalies can feel confident knowing that their hand is well shielded from hard shots and potential injuries. The palm padding is certainly a strong suit of this glove.

However, there are a few negative aspects to consider as well. First and foremost, while the new finger and pinky loops improve traction, I couldn't help but feel that most goalies will still miss the finger stalls that were present in previous models. This omission may be disappointing for those who are accustomed to using finger stalls for added control and stability.

Additionally, the EFlex 6 581 glove seems to fall somewhere between a traditional 580 and a fully updated model. It retains some of the traditional features, which may not appeal to goalies looking for a complete overhaul in design. This hybrid feel could be a hit or miss depending on individual preferences.

Lastly, while the game ready fit of the EFlex 6 581 glove has seen improvements, it still falls short of being the best in the industry. Some goalies may find the glove's closure and fit not as exceptional as they had hoped for, especially when compared to other top-tier goalie gloves on the market.

In conclusion, the CCM EFlex 6 581 hockey goalie glove has its pros and cons. The addition of finger and pinky loops, an improved game ready palm, a well-designed wrist strap, and robust palm padding are definite highlights. However, the absence of finger stalls, the hybrid feel reminiscent of a traditional model, and a game ready fit that doesn't quite reach the industry's best leave room for improvement. Ultimately, it's crucial for goalies to consider their specific needs and preferences before deciding if the EFlex 6 581 glove is the right fit for them.

1 hour ago, coopaloop1234 said:

Don't hate me because I'm beautiful. 

1 hour ago, coopaloop1234 said:

What's wrong with my White/Red Ultrasonic/Mach/Hyperlite mutt combo? 

I love the name of this thread and that @coopaloop1234 started it. Now... if only he'd get stylish pads.

12 hours ago, WizYuan said:

Started a new family

Ask away about my kids 580, 590, and 600

That's one way to figure out which glove is best for you!

Are those all retail gloves ordered through Bauer?

9 hours ago, nyislesfan said:

I got a large Warrior Ritual X3 E+ Senior Goalie Chest & Arm Protector and not sure if its too big/bulky for me or I just need to break it in.

 

I used it for the first time on ice today and the arms are about 1-2inches too long and as it definitely interferes with my glove. Blocker hand is better but not ideal.

 

When I sat down i couldnt even lift the towel over my head .

I havent had a new chest protector in 15 years so dont know if all of this is normal or not. Do I need a smaller size?

If it interferes, I’d say too long… how does the body fit?

5 minutes ago, ZeroGravitas said:

 

I restored the post and removed any/all flags on Ace. Please ban me if I've overstepped.

@Chenner29 he's earning the employee of the month parking spot!

57 minutes ago, ihavenofivehole said:

Any chance you’d want to sell this unit? I’d be very interested if so 

Can everyone see the post here from @ihavenofivehole? Added a new spam setup and confirming the proper new member posts are getting through

Made some changes, I THINK spam should be more under control now? Thanks to everyone for their patience

@ZeroGravitas thanks for stepping up and helping with SPAM elimination too

F1 is made by a 3rd party contract manufacturer offshore. To my knowledge, this is the same factory that produces the GFL masks for CCM. 

18 hours ago, ZeroGravitas said:

https://invisioncommunity.com/4guides/staff-and-moderation/moderating-content-r74/

Scroll down to "Automatic Moderation" and "Community Moderation". There's some neat stuff there that might work for this board.

Thanks - I have reported this stuff in the past. They don't have like a customer service that will work with me 1:1 to solve this.

16 hours ago, jerd31 said:

I’m in a Fit 2 NME VTX now, where does the NME One slot in?  

I am fit 2 in both

M in 960.

1 hour ago, seagoal said:

This is a really important point, especially related to the choice between a Bauer and Sportmask--these two brands fit and feel very different.  I own a couple of each and toggling back and forth, you definitely notice the difference.

To that point, I have a very neutral head shape. Some masks fit better than other... but, generally speaking, I can wear anything. So absolutely, if possible, go to a high end shop and get properly fit.