Jump to content

TheGoalNet

Administrators
  • Posts

    7,006
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    210

Everything posted by TheGoalNet

  1. This was confirmed to be an EFlex without the knee rolls and not a Premier without the inner roll. Axis 1 and 12.1 were both something similar to a stiff EFlex without knee rolls... No matter what I am told, I assume this to be the prototype for either of those pads. I am not sure if the break up was 100% defined at the start of that season. I do know that what ended up being Axis was something Lefevre and CCM initially discussed together.
  2. I agree. I ordered a Vapor 90 from Bauer this year. I was salty I could not get the Mach internals on the Vapor 90 glove. I am gonna just ignore the wrist strap when it comes in.
  3. Have used the glove. My initial unboxing thoughts are pretty dead on. The loops upgrade the glove from strange and borderline awkward to unique and different. My hand never felt like it was floating in a mitten, which it did with 591. The closure feels much different than a legacy glove and almost mechanical? But it works very very well. The glove has great puck retention. There were a couple that didn't catch cleanly and they stayed in the glove perfectly. This is definitively progress from the 591, but I am still not sure if the 80% majority of goalies would pick this over a traditional 580. 580 is still available via a custom order.
  4. Welcome to the board, thanks for joining
  5. Went with the max rebound, this pad is probably spec'd closer to an Axis 2 than a EFlex 6 stock. 1. Always leery to say what a retail experience is vs mine, because I go direct to the brand. But it was pretty apples to apples with Bauer. I used a friend to do a mock up, CCM edited the mock up, I made a couple tweaks, and then it was approved. I am friends with the person that is who does the custom CCM graphics right now. I also contacted him directly with a few questions. Standard retail customers won't be able to do that either. 2. I have suggested that for like 7 years now. The response I have always gotten is "we want to focus on the future, not the past". With social media, most good sets will be seen. We've already seen an H10, Revoke, Helite 3 (GGN), OG Potvin (Me), 2nd Gen Potvin (Pro Skate Goal), etc. I think a customer could just say "I want an H10 now and it would be easy to do". Unless something is in the works I don't know know about, I would assume no formal program comes.
  6. yours is stock? Does it have 2 fingers loops or 1? I have an index and a pinky on my total custom pro
  7. Locking thread. @Hopeful-Padstacker welcome and please throw your question on the existing thread
  8. This... When it comes to rebounds, no one is in Bauer' league. Sliding, etc are all much closer brand to brand
  9. Total Custom Pro is made on the pro department assembly line in the same factory. I don't have specifics on the differences. It's where the NHL, CHL, etc gear is done
  10. Agree. It may not translate to sales, but A+ effort for trying to improve it Since TGN started, I’d say the glove has improved the least. It’s due for a major revolution
  11. I recently unboxed the new CCM EFlex 6 581 hockey goalie glove, and overall, it left me with mixed feelings. While it certainly has its positive aspects, there were a few drawbacks that may leave some goalies wanting to order a classic 580 instead. Let's start with the positives. One of the standout features of the EFlex 6 581 glove is the addition of new finger and pinky loops. These loops provide excellent traction, making it easier to close the glove. This should translate to easy puck control to secure those hard shots. It's a small detail, but it can make a significant difference in performance. Another notable benefit is the game ready palm. Compared to its predecessor, the 591, the palm on the EFlex 6 581 closes much better. This improvement allows for easier transition from purchase to on ice usage and overall comfort. The wrist strap design on this glove is also worth mentioning. It's the same as the 591. Based on my 591 experience, it offers a secure and comfortable fit, ensuring that the glove stays in place during intense gameplay. This attention to detail in the strap design enhances the overall user experience and adds to the glove's usability. Furthermore, the palm padding of the EFlex 6 581 glove is robust and provides excellent protection. Base on my experience with the 591 of similar construction, goalies can feel confident knowing that their hand is well shielded from hard shots and potential injuries. The palm padding is certainly a strong suit of this glove. However, there are a few negative aspects to consider as well. First and foremost, while the new finger and pinky loops improve traction, I couldn't help but feel that most goalies will still miss the finger stalls that were present in previous models. This omission may be disappointing for those who are accustomed to using finger stalls for added control and stability. Additionally, the EFlex 6 581 glove seems to fall somewhere between a traditional 580 and a fully updated model. It retains some of the traditional features, which may not appeal to goalies looking for a complete overhaul in design. This hybrid feel could be a hit or miss depending on individual preferences. Lastly, while the game ready fit of the EFlex 6 581 glove has seen improvements, it still falls short of being the best in the industry. Some goalies may find the glove's closure and fit not as exceptional as they had hoped for, especially when compared to other top-tier goalie gloves on the market. In conclusion, the CCM EFlex 6 581 hockey goalie glove has its pros and cons. The addition of finger and pinky loops, an improved game ready palm, a well-designed wrist strap, and robust palm padding are definite highlights. However, the absence of finger stalls, the hybrid feel reminiscent of a traditional model, and a game ready fit that doesn't quite reach the industry's best leave room for improvement. Ultimately, it's crucial for goalies to consider their specific needs and preferences before deciding if the EFlex 6 581 glove is the right fit for them.
  12. I love the name of this thread and that @coopaloop1234 started it. Now... if only he'd get stylish pads.
  13. That's one way to figure out which glove is best for you! Are those all retail gloves ordered through Bauer?
  14. If it interferes, I’d say too long… how does the body fit?
  15. @Chenner29 he's earning the employee of the month parking spot!
  16. Can everyone see the post here from @ihavenofivehole? Added a new spam setup and confirming the proper new member posts are getting through
  17. Made some changes, I THINK spam should be more under control now? Thanks to everyone for their patience @ZeroGravitas thanks for stepping up and helping with SPAM elimination too
  18. F1 is made by a 3rd party contract manufacturer offshore. To my knowledge, this is the same factory that produces the GFL masks for CCM.
  19. Thanks - I have reported this stuff in the past. They don't have like a customer service that will work with me 1:1 to solve this.
  20. To that point, I have a very neutral head shape. Some masks fit better than other... but, generally speaking, I can wear anything. So absolutely, if possible, go to a high end shop and get properly fit.
×
×
  • Create New...